Introduction – Company Background
GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. is a specialized manufacturer dedicated to the development and production of high-quality insoles.
With a strong foundation in material science and footwear ergonomics, we serve as a trusted partner for global brands seeking reliable insole solutions that combine comfort, functionality, and design.
With years of experience in insole production and OEM/ODM services, GuangXin has successfully supported a wide range of clients across various industries—including sportswear, health & wellness, orthopedic care, and daily footwear.
From initial prototyping to mass production, we provide comprehensive support tailored to each client’s market and application needs.
At GuangXin, we are committed to quality, innovation, and sustainable development. Every insole we produce reflects our dedication to precision craftsmanship, forward-thinking design, and ESG-driven practices.
By integrating eco-friendly materials, clean production processes, and responsible sourcing, we help our partners meet both market demand and environmental goals.
Core Strengths in Insole Manufacturing
At GuangXin Industrial, our core strength lies in our deep expertise and versatility in insole and pillow manufacturing. We specialize in working with a wide range of materials, including PU (polyurethane), natural latex, and advanced graphene composites, to develop insoles and pillows that meet diverse performance, comfort, and health-support needs.
Whether it's cushioning, support, breathability, or antibacterial function, we tailor material selection to the exact requirements of each project-whether for foot wellness or ergonomic sleep products.
We provide end-to-end manufacturing capabilities under one roof—covering every stage from material sourcing and foaming, to precision molding, lamination, cutting, sewing, and strict quality control. This full-process control not only ensures product consistency and durability, but also allows for faster lead times and better customization flexibility.
With our flexible production capacity, we accommodate both small batch custom orders and high-volume mass production with equal efficiency. Whether you're a startup launching your first insole or pillow line, or a global brand scaling up to meet market demand, GuangXin is equipped to deliver reliable OEM/ODM solutions that grow with your business.
Customization & OEM/ODM Flexibility
GuangXin offers exceptional flexibility in customization and OEM/ODM services, empowering our partners to create insole products that truly align with their brand identity and target market. We develop insoles tailored to specific foot shapes, end-user needs, and regional market preferences, ensuring optimal fit and functionality.
Our team supports comprehensive branding solutions, including logo printing, custom packaging, and product integration support for marketing campaigns. Whether you're launching a new product line or upgrading an existing one, we help your vision come to life with attention to detail and consistent brand presentation.
With fast prototyping services and efficient lead times, GuangXin helps reduce your time-to-market and respond quickly to evolving trends or seasonal demands. From concept to final production, we offer agile support that keeps you ahead of the competition.
Quality Assurance & Certifications
Quality is at the heart of everything we do. GuangXin implements a rigorous quality control system at every stage of production—ensuring that each insole meets the highest standards of consistency, comfort, and durability.
We provide a variety of in-house and third-party testing options, including antibacterial performance, odor control, durability testing, and eco-safety verification, to meet the specific needs of our clients and markets.
Our products are fully compliant with international safety and environmental standards, such as REACH, RoHS, and other applicable export regulations. This ensures seamless entry into global markets while supporting your ESG and product safety commitments.
ESG-Oriented Sustainable Production
At GuangXin Industrial, we are committed to integrating ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) values into every step of our manufacturing process. We actively pursue eco-conscious practices by utilizing eco-friendly materials and adopting low-carbon production methods to reduce environmental impact.
To support circular economy goals, we offer recycled and upcycled material options, including innovative applications such as recycled glass and repurposed LCD panel glass. These materials are processed using advanced techniques to retain performance while reducing waste—contributing to a more sustainable supply chain.
We also work closely with our partners to support their ESG compliance and sustainability reporting needs, providing documentation, traceability, and material data upon request. Whether you're aiming to meet corporate sustainability targets or align with global green regulations, GuangXin is your trusted manufacturing ally in building a better, greener future.
Let’s Build Your Next Insole Success Together
Looking for a reliable insole manufacturing partner that understands customization, quality, and flexibility? GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. specializes in high-performance insole production, offering tailored solutions for brands across the globe. Whether you're launching a new insole collection or expanding your existing product line, we provide OEM/ODM services built around your unique design and performance goals.
From small-batch custom orders to full-scale mass production, our flexible insole manufacturing capabilities adapt to your business needs. With expertise in PU, latex, and graphene insole materials, we turn ideas into functional, comfortable, and market-ready insoles that deliver value.
Contact us today to discuss your next insole project. Let GuangXin help you create custom insoles that stand out, perform better, and reflect your brand’s commitment to comfort, quality, and sustainability.
🔗 Learn more or get in touch:
🌐 Website: https://www.deryou-tw.com/
📧 Email: shela.a9119@msa.hinet.net
📘 Facebook: facebook.com/deryou.tw
📷 Instagram: instagram.com/deryou.tw
China pillow ODM development service
Are you looking for a trusted and experienced manufacturing partner that can bring your comfort-focused product ideas to life? GuangXin Industrial Co., Ltd. is your ideal OEM/ODM supplier, specializing in insole production, pillow manufacturing, and advanced graphene product design.
With decades of experience in insole OEM/ODM, we provide full-service manufacturing—from PU and latex to cutting-edge graphene-infused insoles—customized to meet your performance, support, and breathability requirements. Our production process is vertically integrated, covering everything from material sourcing and foaming to molding, cutting, and strict quality control.Vietnam custom insole OEM supplier
Beyond insoles, GuangXin also offers pillow OEM/ODM services with a focus on ergonomic comfort and functional innovation. Whether you need memory foam, latex, or smart material integration for neck and sleep support, we deliver tailor-made solutions that reflect your brand’s values.
We are especially proud to lead the way in ESG-driven insole development. Through the use of recycled materials—such as repurposed LCD glass—and low-carbon production processes, we help our partners meet sustainability goals without compromising product quality. Our ESG insole solutions are designed not only for comfort but also for compliance with global environmental standards.One-stop OEM/ODM solution provider Thailand
At GuangXin, we don’t just manufacture products—we create long-term value for your brand. Whether you're developing your first product line or scaling up globally, our flexible production capabilities and collaborative approach will help you go further, faster.Flexible manufacturing OEM & ODM China
📩 Contact us today to learn how our insole OEM, pillow ODM, and graphene product design services can elevate your product offering—while aligning with the sustainability expectations of modern consumers.Graphene-infused pillow ODM China
A recent study suggests that the primary components of life on Earth may have originated from solar eruptions. The research demonstrated that solar particles colliding with gases in Earth’s primitive atmosphere could produce amino acids and carboxylic acids, the fundamental elements of proteins and organic life. Using data from NASA’s Kepler mission, researchers proposed that energetic particles from the sun, during its early superflare stage, would regularly interact with our atmosphere, triggering essential chemical reactions. Experimental replications indicated that solar particles appear to be a more efficient energy source than lightning for the formation of amino acids and carboxylic acids. Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center A new study posits that the earliest building blocks of life on Earth, namely amino acids and carboxylic acids, may have been formed due to solar eruptions. The research suggests that energetic particles from the sun during its early stages, colliding with Earth’s primitive atmosphere, could have efficiently catalyzed essential chemical reactions, thus challenging the traditional “warm little pond” theory. The first building blocks of life on Earth may have formed thanks to eruptions from our Sun, a new study finds. A series of chemical experiments show how solar particles, colliding with gases in Earth’s early atmosphere, can form amino acids and carboxylic acids, the basic building blocks of proteins and organic life. The findings were published in the journal Life. To understand the origins of life, many scientists try to explain how amino acids, the raw materials from which proteins and all cellular life, were formed. The best-known proposal originated in the late 1800s as scientists speculated that life might have begun in a “warm little pond”: A soup of chemicals, energized by lightning, heat, and other energy sources, that could mix together in concentrated amounts to form organic molecules. Artist’s concept of Early Earth. Credit: NASA In 1953, Stanley Miller of the University of Chicago tried to recreate these primordial conditions in the lab. Miller filled a closed chamber with methane, ammonia, water, and molecular hydrogen – gases thought to be prevalent in Earth’s early atmosphere – and repeatedly ignited an electrical spark to simulate lightning. A week later, Miller and his graduate advisor Harold Urey analyzed the chamber’s contents and found that 20 different amino acids had formed. “That was a big revelation,” said Vladimir Airapetian, a stellar astrophysicist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and coauthor of the new paper. “From the basic components of early Earth’s atmosphere, you can synthesize these complex organic molecules.” But the last 70 years have complicated this interpretation. Scientists now believe ammonia (NH3) and methane (CH4) were far less abundant; instead, Earth’s air was filled with carbon dioxide (CO2) and molecular nitrogen (N2), which require more energy to break down. These gases can still yield amino acids, but in greatly reduced quantities. Seeking alternative energy sources, some scientists pointed to shockwaves from incoming meteors. Others cited solar ultraviolet radiation. Airapetian, using data from NASA’s Kepler mission, pointed to a new idea: energetic particles from our Sun. Kepler observed far-off stars at different stages in their lifecycle, but its data provides hints about our Sun’s past. In 2016, Airapetian published a study suggesting that during Earth’s first 100 million years, the Sun was about 30% dimmer. But solar “superflares” – powerful eruptions we only see once every 100 years or so today – would have erupted once every 3-10 days. These superflares launch near-light speed particles that would regularly collide with our atmosphere, kickstarting chemical reactions. Energy from our young Sun – 4 billion years ago – aided in creating molecules in Earth’s atmosphere that allowed it to warm up enough to incubate life. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/Genna Duberstein “As soon as I published that paper, the team from the Yokohama National University from Japan contacted me,” Airapetian said. Dr. Kobayashi, a professor of chemistry there, had spent the last 30 years studying prebiotic chemistry. He was trying to understand how galactic cosmic rays – incoming particles from outside our solar system – could have affected early Earth’s atmosphere. “Most investigators ignore galactic cosmic rays because they require specialized equipment, like particle accelerators,” Kobayashi said. “I was fortunate enough to have access to several of them near our facilities.” Minor tweaks to Kobayashi’s experimental setup could put Airapetian’s ideas to the test. Proton Power vs. Lightning Energy Airapetian, Kobayashi, and their collaborators created a mixture of gases matching early Earth’s atmosphere as we understand it today. They combined carbon dioxide, molecular nitrogen, water, and a variable amount of methane. (The methane proportion in Earth’s early atmosphere is uncertain but thought to be low.) They shot the gas mixtures with protons (simulating solar particles) or ignited them with spark discharges (simulating lightning), replicating the Miller-Urey experiment for comparison. As long as the methane proportion was over 0.5%, the mixtures shot by protons (solar particles) produced detectable amounts of amino acids and carboxylic acids. But the spark discharges (lightning) required about a 15% methane concentration before any amino acids formed at all. “And even at 15% methane, the production rate of the amino acids by lightning is a million times less than by protons,” Airapetian added. Protons also tended to produce more carboxylic acids (a precursor of amino acids) than those ignited by spark discharges. A close up of a solar eruption, including a solar flare, a coronal mass ejection, and a solar energetic particle event. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center All else being equal, solar particles appear to be a more efficient energy source than lightning. But all else likely wasn’t equal, Airapetian suggested. Miller and Urey assumed that lightning was just as common at the time of the “warm little pond” as it is today. But lightning, which comes from thunderclouds formed by rising warm air, would have been rarer under a 30% dimmer Sun. “During cold conditions you never have lightning, and early Earth was under a pretty faint Sun,” Airapetian said. “That’s not saying that it couldn’t have come from lightning, but lightning seems less likely now, and solar particles seems more likely.” These experiments suggest our active young Sun could have catalyzed the precursors of life more easily, and perhaps earlier, than previously assumed. Reference: “Formation of Amino Acids and Carboxylic Acids in Weakly Reducing Planetary Atmospheres by Solar Energetic Particles from the Young Sun” by Kensei Kobayashi Jun-ichi Ise, Ryohei Aoki, Miei Kinoshita, Koki Naito, Takumi Udo, Bhagawati Kunwar, Jun-ichi Takahashi, Hiromi Shibata, Hajime Mita, Hitoshi Fukuda, Yoshiyuki Oguri, Kimitaka Kawamura, Yoko Kebukawa and Vladimir S. Airapetian, 28 April 2023, Life. DOI: 10.3390/life13051103
The Scyphozoon Atolla sp., a deep-sea species, was an important prey for the blue wolffish, a demersal fish that lives at greater depths. Credit: Alfred Wegener Institute / Mario Hoppmann Jellyfish are consumed in greater quantities by fish in Greenlandic waters than previously thought, altering perceptions of the jellyfish’s role in marine ecosystems. Scientists long believed jellyfish to be a poor dietary choice for predatory fish, but recent research by a team from the Alfred Wegener Institute and the Thünen Institute has revealed that fish in the waters of Greenland actually do consume jellyfish. In two of the analyzed species, they even made up the majority of the food, as the researchers describe in a study published in the journal Royal Society Open Science. The results suggest that the role of jellyfish as prey in marine food webs should be reconsidered, especially in regard to the fact that they could be profiting from climate change and spreading farther and farther north. Jellyfish are found in all oceans, from polar to tropical regions. In the future, gelatinous zooplankton could spread even further, as it is generally one of the winners of climate change: unlike other species, jellyfish are able to better cope with the fact that the global oceans are becoming warmer and more acidic. “Therefore, it is important that we rethink and understand how jellyfish and gelatinous zooplankton generally fit into marine food webs,” says Dr Charlotte Havermans, head of the ARJEL junior research group at the Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI). In a new study, she and her team have therefore investigated the role of gelatinous zooplankton as prey for fish in Greenlandic waters. Greenlandic waters are home to large quantities of various types of gelatinous zooplankton. However, whether and to what extent jellyfish and co. are on the menu of the fish that live here was previously unclear. “We analyzed the stomach contents of seven fish species, including commercially used species such as Atlantic cod, haddock, and redfish,” says Charlotte Havermans. “With the help of DNA metabarcoding, we were able to determine very precisely what the animals fed on.” The results were surprising: “We found DNA of jelly in the stomachs of all examined fish species, albeit in varying quantities,” says Annkathrin Dischereit, first author of the study and doctoral student in ARJEL. For two species, the greater silver smelt and the northern wolffish, they even made up the largest proportion of the food. This is despite the fact that gelatinous zooplankton is widely considered a trophic dead end and emergency food for some fish species at best. “This assumption is based on the fact that their tissue is quickly digested by predator fish and jellyfish are therefore rarely recorded as prey in studies,” explains Annkathrin Dischereit. Modern method shows that the role of jellyfish is greater than previously thought DNA metabarcoding provided a solution to this situation: Using this state-of-the-art method, researchers were able to detect short gene fragments in the stomachs, compare them with genetic reference databases, and thus identify those prey species to which the fragments belonged. “We were able to see that every species we analyzed fed on jellyfish or other gelatinous zooplankton,” explains Annkathrin Dischereit. “We detected up to 59 species of gelatinous invertebrates in the stomachs of the fish. This clearly shows that they play a significant but previously overlooked role in the subarctic food web.” The stomach contents of some of these species had never been analyzed before in this area. The study shows that we need to rethink our view of the role of jellyfish and co. in marine food webs. Gelatinous zooplankton is more than just stop-gap food. It is regular prey for predator fish higher up the food chain. “Our results raise the question of why fish seem to eat jellyfish surprisingly frequently,” says Charlotte Havermans. Despite their low energy density, their contribution to the energy budget of predator fish could be more significant than previously assumed: They could be digested more quickly, are easier to hunt, are increasingly common, and provide energy-rich components thanks to their diet. “There is still a need for research here,” says Annkathrin Dischereit. “Our study provides a snapshot in time that only takes into account recently digested prey. We need to collect continuous samples throughout the year and link these to how the gelatinous zooplankton communities change over this period of time. Only then can we understand the trophic links between fish and gelatinous zooplankton.” This is absolutely necessary, as Charlotte Havermans says: “Only trophic insights can provide information on why jellyfish are important for fish and other organisms.” So far, no proper trophic studies have yet been carried out on several species, such as redfish. “The results of our current study raise doubts about how well we understand subpolar ecosystems and how the recently observed increase in gelatinous zooplankton might affect them.” Reference: “A belly full of jelly? DNA metabarcoding shows evidence for gelatinous zooplankton predation by several fish species in Greenland waters” by Annkathrin Dischereit, Julia Katharina Throm, Karl Michael Werner, Stefan Neuhaus and Charlotte Havermans, 1 August 2024, Royal Society Open Science. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240797
Scientists at the National Institutes of Health have identified new genetic risk factors for two types of non-Alzheimer’s dementia, with a previously unknown variant discovered in the TCPN1 gene associated with Lewy body dementia. Discovery Provides Potential Clues for Lewy Body and Frontotemporal Dementias In a collaborative effort between the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and National Institute on Aging (NIA), scientists have discovered new genetic risk factors for non-Alzheimer’s dementia types, Lewy body dementia (LBD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Published in Cell Genomics, the research team identified large-scale DNA changes, known as structural variants, by analyzing thousands of DNA samples using cutting-edge computer algorithms and machine learning. The study revealed a previously unknown variant in the TCPN1 gene associated with a higher risk for developing LBD, while also confirming well-established risk factors for FTD in the C9orf72 and MAPT genes. The researchers have made the analysis code and raw data available to the scientific community, along with an interactive app for further study. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health have identified new genetic risk factors for two types of non-Alzheimer’s dementia. These findings were published in Cell Genomics and detail how researchers identified large-scale DNA changes, known as structural variants, by analyzing thousands of DNA samples. The team discovered several structural variants that could be risk factors Lewy body dementia (LBD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). The project was a collaborative effort between scientists at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) at NIH. Structural variants have been implicated in a variety of neurological disorders. Unlike more commonly studied mutations, which often affect one or a few DNA building blocks called nucleotides, structural variants represent at least 50 but often hundreds, or even thousands, of nucleotides at once, making them more challenging to study. “If you imagine that our entire genetic code is a book, a structural variant would be a paragraph, page, or even an entire chapter that has been removed, duplicated, or inserted in the wrong place,” said Sonja W. Scholz, M.D., Ph.D., investigator in the neurogenetics branch of NINDS and senior author of this study. By combining cutting-edge computer algorithms capable of mapping structural variations across the whole genome with machine learning, the research team analyzed whole-genome data from thousands of patient samples and several thousand unaffected controls. TCPN1 Variant in Lewy Body Dementia A previously unknown variant in the gene TCPN1 was found in samples from patients with LBD, a disease, that like Parkinson’s disease, is associated with abnormal deposits of the protein alpha-synuclein in the brain. This variant, in which more than 300 nucleotides are deleted from the gene, is associated with a higher risk for developing LBD. While this finding is new for LBD, TCPN1 is a known risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease, which could mean that this structural variant plays a role in the broader dementia population. “From a genetics standpoint, this is a very exciting finding,” said Dr. Scholz. “It provides a point of reference for cell biology and animal model studies and possibly down the road, a target for intervention.” By looking at a group of 50 genes implicated in inherited neurodegenerative diseases, the investigators were able to identify additional rare structural variants, including several that are known to cause disease. The analyses also identified two well-established risk factors for FTD changes in the C9orf72 and MAPT genes. These proof-of-concept findings bolstered the strength of the study’s new findings by demonstrating that the algorithms were properly working. Because reference maps for currently-available structural variants are limited, the researchers generated a catalog based on the data obtained in these analyses. The analysis code and all the raw data are now available to the scientific community for use in their studies. An interactive app also allows investigators to study their genes of interest and ask which variants are present in controls vs. LBD or FTD cases. The authors assert these resources may make complex genetic data more accessible to non-bioinformatics experts, which will accelerate the pace of discovery. “Research to unravel the intricate genetic architecture of neurodegenerative diseases is resulting in significant advances in scientific understanding,” said Bryan J. Traynor, M.D., Ph.D., senior investigator at NIA. “With each discovery, we shed light on the mechanisms behind neuronal cell death or dysfunction, paving the way for precision medicine to combat these debilitating and fatal disorders.” Researchers expect that the dataset will continue to grow as additional data are analyzed. Reference: “Genome-wide structural variant analysis identifies risk loci for non-Alzheimer’s dementias” by Karri Kaivola, Ruth Chia, Jinhui Ding, Memoona Rasheed, Masashi Fujita, Vilas Menon, Ronald L. Walton, Ryan L. Collins, Kimberley Billingsley, Harrison Brand, Michael Talkowski, Xuefang Zhao, Ramita Dewan, Ali Stark, Anindita Ray, Sultana Solaiman, Pilar Alvarez Jerez, Laksh Malik, Ted M. Dawson, Liana S. Rosenthal, Marilyn S. Albert, Olga Pletnikova, Juan C. Troncoso, Mario Masellis, Julia Keith, Sandra E. Black, Luigi Ferrucci, Susan M. Resnick, Toshiko Tanaka, The American Genome Center, International LBD Genomics Consortium, International ALS/FTD Consortium, PROSPECT Consortium, Eric Topol, Ali Torkamani, Pentti Tienari, Tatiana M. Foroud, Bernardino Ghetti, John E. Landers, Mina Ryten, Huw R. Morris, John A. Hardy, Letizia Mazzini, Sandra D’Alfonso, Cristina Moglia, Andrea Calvo, Geidy E. Serrano, Thomas G. Beach, Tanis Ferman, Neill R. Graff-Radford, Bradley F. Boeve, Zbigniew K. Wszolek, Dennis W. Dickson, Adriano Chiò, David A. Bennett, Philip L. De Jager, Owen A. Ross, Clifton L. Dalgard, J. Raphael Gibbs, Bryan J. Traynor and Sonja W. Scholz, 4 May 2023, Cell Genomics. DOI: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100316 This work was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program at NINDS and NIA.
DVDV1551RTWW78V
Insole ODM factory in Thailand 》delivering consistent quality from sample to mass productionIndonesia anti-bacterial pillow ODM design 》manufacturing with a focus on sustainability and comfortChina insole ODM for global brands 》committed to ESG, comfort, and your brand is success